Archive for November, 2010

Nov 26 2010

Proposed chain-link fence at Lake Casitas is a huge mistake and waste of money

Published by admin under Articles

Written by Suza Francina on November 1, 2010

To a wild animal there is a world of difference between the current open barbed-wire fence and a six-foot chain link fence topped with barbed wire.

In spite of the protests of the Ojai Wildlife League and other citizens since last May, the California Bureau of Reclamation has approved the Casitas Municipal Water District’s request for a mile long six-foot high chain-link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire.

According to the “Categorical Exclusion Checklist” report, the proposed chain-link fence will replace the existing barbed-wire fencing, that was built when Lake Casitas opened in 1960. It is expected to cost $140,000 and will be erected along the current fence line around the northeast border of the Lake Casitas Recreation Area, along Santa Ana Road.

The new fence is being characterized as no more than a replacement of the original. The “Categorical Exclusion” report states that “In general, the new fence would take up the same footprint as the existing barbed wire fencing…”

It is our opinion that the process used to come to this conclusion is flawed. To a wild animal there is a world of difference between the current open barbed-wire fence and a six-foot chain link fence topped with barbed wire.

The Casitas Lake area is pastoral open space with hundreds of deer and other wildlife dependent on the Lake Casitas water supply, especially during the hot summer months. The lake is a sanctuary for wildlife. Residents who walk this area early in the morning have observed many animals coming down from the hills, crossing the road and going through the existing fence to get to the water.

The Ojai Wildlife League (OWL) is concerned that if animals cannot get through the proposed chain-link fence using existing wildlife corridors, that they will be in serious trouble.

Along with other members of OWL I walked the fence line with a map of the new plan in hand. Unlike the proposed chain-link fence, the current fence is low enough and has openings so that wildlife coming down from the hills across from Santa Ana road can go under, over and even in between the strands of the fence to get to the lake to drink.

The public has been told that eleven sections of the new fence (about 20% of its length) will consist of the original barbed wire. According to the report: “In some areas where the existing barbed-wire fencing is still functional across drainages and high points, the barbed-wire fencing would be left in place in order to facilitate animal passage.”

As I and the other OWL members walked the area, we tried to visualize how animals coming down from the hills would find their way to these openings in order to have access to the lake.

A biologist and longtime resident in the area who has spent many years observing animals cross Santa Ana Road pointed out that deer prefer to jump in areas that are level with the road on both sides of the fence, not across drainages and high points.

Wildlife looking for openings in a fence this close to the road have a much greater chance of being killed or injured and causing vehicle accidents and injury to humans.

Public Safety Concerns
The rationale that the public has been given for this new fence is that there is a need for security for the public water supply. In addition, the threat of the invasive Quagga mussel is still present, and the perimeter of the lake needs to be protected from illegal boat entry.

It is the position of the Ojai Wildlife League (OWL) that there are other ways to address these issues, that allow animals safe passage to drink from the lake. These alternatives include the use of more wildlife friendly permeable fencing, more of the existing wooden posts around the lake that prevent boats from entering illegally, more signs with stiff fines for illegal boat entry, etc.,

All across the country fences create barriers and traps for wildlife, from large animals to birds, causing injuries and often slow, painful deaths.

A guide entitled “How to Build A Fence With Wildlife in Mind,” explains that even when animals do clear fences or crawl underneath or through them they often bear countless scars from wire strands. Saddest of all, some fences are barriers to fawns and calves, even if adults can jump over. Separated from their mothers, the youngsters curl up and die of starvation, stranded and unable to follow the herd.

It is not possible to protect every source of drinking water by surrounding it with a fence. This would include every river and stream if those watercourses eventually ran into lakes and reservoirs. All of the Ventura River, Coyote Creek and the North Fork of Matilija Creek would need to be fenced off. Santa Ana Creek and North Fork Coyote Creek also flow into the lake.

The irony is that even with the proposed new fence trespassers can still enter through the spaces allowed for animal passage. And even barbed wire topped chain-link fences can be rendered useless with a pair of heavy-duty bolt cutters.

If the fence is supposed to be for the security of our drinking water one wonders how a fence is going to stop an airdrop of some massive quantity of poison in the middle of the night, or other clandestine activity?

How is a fence going to stop a terrorist from paying his $10 entry fee, driving a van to some easily accessible piece of shoreline, and discharging some substance into the lake in broad daylight?

It is impossible to make our water supply completely safe, even if we had airport like security at the Casitas gate entrance! There are too many points of entry and they can’t all be protected.

In addition to these concerns, there is the issue of safety. This fence is right along a main artery to the lake and sees lots of traffic, especially during weekends, holidays and special events.

The fence is located between speeding car traffic and the lake, with wildlife caught in the middle. What happens when a herd of deer that is accustomed to jumping the old fence is faced with this new higher chain-link barbed wire topped fence?

Do we fully understand the safety issues both for humans driving by the fence, especially at night, and the consequences of forcing different kinds of animals to share small openings to access water?

Instead of spreading out the nightly animal migration to the lake, this fence would be funneling all of the wildlife into a handful of small openings.

Wildlife corridors are miles wide, not a few feet wide. Some of the openings in the proposed fence are in brush filled barancas that deer do not usually push their way through. Deer usually stay in open areas where they can jump and flee from predators. The other three sides of the lake are not only heavily brushed they are mostly upslope and steep terrain.

There will be many different kinds of wildlife traffic funneled into these small openings: deer, foxes, coyotes, bears, skunks, raccoons, road runners, opossums, squirrels, wild cats, feral cats, feral pigs and mountain lions, some with their offspring following along.

This chain-link fence creates a situation that forces animals into small openings on a road where people often travel over 50 mph, slowing down at the curves or the natural inclines of the road. On a moon-lit night drivers tend to look at the lake and are often not giving the road their full attention. This could translate into accidents on a road that has no lighting at night.

OWL has contacted CMWD Board Members, public officials, wildlife biologists and other experts to express their concerns about the impact of this chain link fence.
If there must be a new fence, OWL is advocating permeable fencing rather than chain link and recommends that the Board reconsider its decision and adopt this more animal friendly type of fencing.

The proposed chain-link barbed wire topped fence is slated for construction in mid November. There is only a very small window of time to voice our objections and ask the CMWD Board and those who have jurisdiction over the Board to reconsider this decision..

The Ojai Valley is known as a community that protects open space and respects wildlife. Lake Casitas is visited every year by wildlife enthusiasts and educators from all over Ventura County and beyond. It should be a model for coexistence between humans and animals.

The consequences of this proposed chain ink fence in this open space watershed will be devastating for years to come.

It is not too late to call the Bureau and Casitas Water board members and express your concerns about the proposed chain-link fence.

Here’s the link for the Casitas Board info.:

http://www.casitaswater.org/lower.php?url=board-of-directors

richhandley@yahoo.com
Richard Handley

reygacho@netzero.net
Russ Baggerly

prefkaiser@earthlink.net
Pete Kaiser

hicki@aol.com
Bill Hicks

anjword@sbcglobal.net
Jim Word

Suza Francina is a former mayor of Ojai and a founding member of the Ojai Wildlife League.

2 responses so far

Nov 06 2010

New Threat to CA Wildlife

Published by admin under Uncategorized

Attention California Wildlife Activists,

The California Department of Fish & Game is studying a proposed plan to close 19 California State Game Refuges, and open them up to hunting. The deadline for public comments on this plan is December 1, 2010. Go to the DFG web site http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/gamerefuges/ . The DFG focuses on the additional “hunting opportunities” that this plan will provide to those that wish to kill game such as deer, bear, coyote, and grey foxes. What they do not address is the impact that opening these refuges to hunting will have on threatened wildlife. They contended that the “Elimination of the “State Game Refuge” designation will have no significant impact on the wildlife and ecosystems of these lands.”

Study the maps provided on the web site. Many of these refuges appear to be located in prime wildlife habitat. Besides animals that are listed as game and varmits, these State Game Refuges provide sanctuary to wild animals like the threatened;

Pacific fisher (Maries pennanti pacifica) Status: (CSSC) California species of special concern; (FC) Federal candidate for listing by Endangered Species Act (ESA); (FSS) Region 5 Forest Service sensitive species.

A victim of the current political climate in Washington DC, his listing as Endangered by the ESA is stalled. http://kswild.org/programs/biodiversity/species-profiles/pacfisher

California wolverine (Gulo gulo luteus) Status: (FSS) Region 5 Forest Service sensitive species; (ST) State threatened;
(SP) State fully protected

This guy needs a date. http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2010/03/calif-wolverine-looks-in-vain-for-a-mate-nearest-is-800-miles-away/1

American marten (Maries Americana) Status: (FSS) Region 5 Forest Service sensitive species; (CSSC) California species of special concern; (MIS) Forest Service management indicator species.

Don’t underestimate cute. http://www.nature.org/animals/mammals/animals/marten.html

Sierra Nevada red fox (Vulpes vulpes necator) listed as a State Threatened but not Federally Endangered species

All these animals are highly susceptible to canine parvo and distemper http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2010/09/supposedly-extinct-red-fox-discovered-in-yosemite-national-park.html

By law these species are technically protected from hunting. Unfortunately, the dogs that are unleashed to chase and attack “game animals” do not always read the hunting regulations. These rare and endangered animals will be devastated by the inevitable “incidental take” from the packs of hunting hounds. To learn more about hound hunting visit: http://www.humanesociety.org/news/multimedia/?fr_story=e2cc7ec09cf7087516729123499176973dd66a09

We need facts and documentation of the natural resources that are on these currently protected lands. I am asking “boots on the ground” environmentalists to study these refuges and to submit comments directly to the Department of Fish & Game, and to assist our legal staff in making our augments to defend California’s wildlife, and provide them with a sustainable and resilient habitat.

Sincerely, – Richard J. Garcia
CNRCC – Black Bear Task Force – Chair
DFG invites input – from their web site;
If you would like to provide input on the State Game Refuges, you may do so by taking this short survey or by sending your comments via email to wildlifestrategy@dfg.ca.gov. Comments must be sent by December 1, 2010.

3 responses so far